ABRAnews Open the whole story. Sign in
Courts

Judge lets Trump's $10 billion defamation suit against the BBC go forward

The judge dismisses a second claim under Florida trade law, while Trump calls the ruling a "huge victory" and the BBC says it is "surprised."

17 news outlets reported this
Liberal7 outletsCase proceeds, but Trump must still prove itCenter4 outletsThe ruling's reasoning and what happens nextConservative6 outletsTrump's "huge victory" and the judge's findings
ABRAnews EditorialPublished 1 min read
Overview

A federal judge in Florida ruled on Tuesday, Nov. 10, that President Trump's $10 billion defamation lawsuit against the BBC can go forward. U.S. District Judge Jeffrey Kuntz, a Trump appointee, denied the BBC's motion to dismiss the defamation claim. He threw out a second claim, brought under Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, finding the documentary was not commercial speech.

Trump sued in December 2025 over an episode of the BBC's Panorama program, "Trump: A Second Chance," which joined two parts of his Jan. 6, 2021 speech. The clips were nearly 55 minutes apart. The BBC has apologized for the edit, and its director general and head of news resigned.

Kuntz found Trump plausibly alleged actual malice and damages, and wrote that the edit was "not trimming around the edges." He did not rule on the merits. Whether Trump can prove his claims is "left for another day."

Trump called the ruling a "huge victory" on Truth Social. A BBC spokesperson said the broadcaster was "surprised" but respects the court's authority and remains confident. Separately, a judge has ordered Trump to give a deposition by Dec. 11 or face possible , including dismissal.

That deadline could be extended.

Key figures

Three sides of the story

7Liberal4Center6Conservative

17 news outlets reported this

Tap a color or swipe sideways to switch sides.

Liberal7 outlets

Case proceeds, but Trump must still prove it

ABC News says the case "remains on track, for the moment," notes the judge did not rule on the merits and tossed the trade-practices claim. It adds that the BBC apologized and two top executives resigned, and it reports the BBC's complaint that Trump has delayed his deposition. CBS News centers on the denied motion and the judge's line that proof of damages is "left for another day."

It carries the BBC's statement and the dispute over Trump's deposition, now due by Dec. 11. The Guardian quotes the ruling at length, including that the edit "may independently establish the plausibility of actual malice." It stresses that Trump must still prove malice at trial and show "actual damages."

It notes the documentary was not broadcast in Florida. The New York Times headlines that the judge allows the lawsuit to proceed and describes a documentary the BBC conceded was misleadingly edited.

Center4 outlets

The ruling's reasoning and what happens next

Euronews leads with the dismissed Florida-law claim, which it says halves the suit to at least $5bn. It quotes the judge on the time gap and covers the BBC's apology and resignations. UPI opens with the ruling and quotes the order, including "the news entity created the story," then explains why the trade-practices count was dismissed.

BBC News reports that the judge found the allegations sufficient but made no ruling on the merits. It adds that Trump's lawyers conceded they had no evidence the program was available in the US on BritBox, the BBC website or other services, and that he dropped BBC Studios from the suit. It also reports that a BBC lawyer told the court Trump prioritized campaigning over a deposition.

Reason posts long excerpts of the decision, including the judge's account of the edit and his finding that actual damages and malice were adequately alleged.

Conservative6 outlets

Trump's "huge victory" and the judge's findings

Breitbart News headlines Trump's claim of a "Huge Victory against Fake News BBC." It calls the BBC a "state broadcaster" and recalls the resignations of its director general and news chief. It says the case is now expected to go to trial next year.

Washington Examiner stresses that Kuntz is a Trump appointee. It quotes his "trimming around the edges" passage and notes the Dec. 11 deposition date could move. Just the News says the BBC "will face a jury trial."

It reports that Kuntz set the BBC's conduct apart from that of CNN and Dow Jones in Trump's unsuccessful suits and quotes law professor Jonathan Turley on seating jurors. The Epoch Times dates the ruling Nov. 10 and says the judge ordered the BBC to answer the claim by Dec. 1. It says the BBC did not immediately respond.

All sources: 18 articles from 17 outlets

Liberal (8)

Center (4)

Conservative (6)

Related
  1. Judge halts tree cutting at DC golf course as Trump vows to appeal
  2. Judge throws out case against two ex-FBI officials accused of lying to Congress
  3. Judge dismisses Trump's $10 billion suit over WSJ story on Epstein birthday letter
  4. New York appeals court hears Trump's bid to overturn hush money conviction
  5. Judge lets Trump's $10 billion defamation suit against the BBC go forwardThis story
Sanctions

Penalties one country imposes on another, or on companies and people: freezing assets, banning trade, cutting off banks. The aim is to change behaviour without war.

All terms →