ABRAnews Three sides to every story.
Courts & Justice

Lindsay Clancy's lawyers ask judge to dismiss murder charges after mistrial

Prosecutors say the rule against being tried twice does not stop them from seeking justice for the three children, and the hearing covered a holdout juror.

15 news outlets reported this
Liberal6 outletsThe defense's argument over the holdout jurorCenter4 outletsWhat happens next: dismissal, retrial or reduced chargesConservative5 outletsThe trial's social media fallout and motherhood
Published 3 min read
Overview

Lindsay Clancy, a Massachusetts woman, returned to court on Monday, Nov. 2, for a hearing on whether she can be tried again over the deaths of her three children. Her first trial ended in a mistrial on Sept. 4 after the jury could not reach a verdict. Her lawyers asked Judge William Sullivan to dismiss the charges on double jeopardy grounds, a rule against trying someone twice for the same crime.

Clancy, 36, has not disputed killing Cora, 5, Dawson, 3, and Callan, 8 months, in 2023. Her defense says she had postpartum psychosis. Prosecutors say she acted deliberately and knew it was wrong.

At the hearing, defense attorney Martin Weinberg argued the judge should have questioned the jury foreperson further after two notes said a juror was not following the rules. That juror, Michael Desronvil, was the lone holdout. Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague said the judge handled the jury properly and that the juror refused to agree, not to deliberate.

Prosecutors argue double jeopardy does not bar them from seeking justice for the children. They were expected to say whether they will retry her on first-degree murder charges or reduce them. Reports said the judge might also set a new trial date.

Key figures
  • 11-1 the jury's split in the deadlock, according to NewsNation — NewsNation
  • June 2027 earliest date defense lawyer Kevin Reddington says he could go to a retrial — BBC News

Three sides of the story

Liberal6 outlets

The defense's argument over the holdout juror

The Guardian takes the reader through the courtroom argument. Defense attorney Martin Weinberg says Judge Sullivan should have gone further after the foreperson's two notes about a juror. "That's what the foreperson was asking the court to do,"

Weinberg said. Prosecutor Jennifer Sprague answers that the judge was "in the best position to judge their credibility" and that the juror "refused to agree," not to deliberate. The Guardian also records a moment when Weinberg told the judge the situation was not easy, and Sullivan replied, "I have thick skin."

Holdout juror Michael Desronvil has said since the trial that he is sure Clancy is guilty and feels nobody listened to him. The Guardian sets the defense account of postpartum psychosis beside the prosecution view that she acted deliberately. The New York Times says the Monday hearing could show whether prosecutors plan to try Clancy again for first-degree murder or lower the charges.

Center4 outlets

What happens next: dismissal, retrial or reduced charges

The BBC asks where the case goes next. It sets out what each side wants and quotes prosecutors, who say the state should be allowed "to continue to pursue justice" for the children. It also quotes legal experts.

Law professor Heather Cucolo says the hearing will likely turn on whether the mistrial was routine, and that she expects the judge to find it appropriate. Lawyer Elyse Hershon says the judge could rule at the hearing or later in writing. UPI gives a short account of the hearing.

It notes that reduced charges could allow a bench trial, citing CNN, and that Sullivan may set a new trial date, citing The New York Times. NewsNation's headline says the hearing "turns heated" and reports an 11-1 deadlock, with one juror reportedly believing Clancy was criminally responsible.

Conservative5 outlets

The trial's social media fallout and motherhood

A Washington Examiner opinion column looks at the culture around the trial more than the courtroom. The writer argues the case set off a social media spectacle in which Clancy's "legion of female fans" identified with her, while others dismissed postpartum conditions as an excuse. In the writer's view, real discussion of motherhood and mental health got lost.

The column cites the CDC for a fall in the marriage rate from 8.3 per 1,000 in 2000 to 6.3 in 2024. It also gives a fertility rate that dropped from 2.12 children per woman in 2007 to 1.6 in 2024. It calls on conservatives to keep promoting marriage and parenthood, to be honest about what they cost, and to show compassion to women who struggle after birth.

The column also recounts the allegation that Clancy strangled her children and the defense claim of psychosis. It asks whether a mentally unwell defendant is fully responsible.

All sources: 19 articles from 15 outlets

Liberal (7)

Center (6)

Conservative (6)

Related