ABRAnews Open the whole story. Sign in
Courts

Nine Kennedy relatives ask to join lawsuits against Trump's arch near Arlington cemetery

The relatives say the 250-foot arch would shadow JFK's grave and was authorized without the congressional approval they say the law requires.

Donald Trump in 2025
Donald Trump in 2025. Photo: Daniel Torok, Public domain, Wikimedia Commons
30 news outlets reported this
Liberal14 outletsKennedy family's personal stake in the arch fightCenter8 outletsKennedys' legal claims and sightline concernsConservative8 outletsFourth lawsuit against Trump's arch, awaiting court ruling
ABRAnews EditorialPublished 1 min read
Overview

Nine members of the Kennedy family asked a federal court in Washington on Tuesday to let them join lawsuits seeking to stop President Trump's planned 250-foot arch. The structure would stand on a traffic circle between Arlington National Cemetery and the Lincoln Memorial. The relatives are children and grandchildren of Robert F. Kennedy and Edward M. Kennedy.

They say the arch would cast a shadow over the Kennedy gravesites, including the eternal flame at John F. Kennedy's grave, and block a sightline designed to symbolize national reunification after the Civil War. Their lawyers, Norm Eisen and Steve Jonas of Democracy Defenders Fund, say only can authorize such a project. The suit argues the and National Park Service authorized the arch without the congressional approval it requires.

Judge Tanya Chutkan has barred construction from starting for 14 days, after a planning commission led by Trump allies voted 8-4 to approve the plans. Their filing adds to challenges already brought by veterans, preservationists, Washington, D.C., Virginia and others. CBS News reports the government argues the arch is lawful and that the plaintiffs lack standing.

White House spokesman Davis Ingle said in a statement issued before the Kennedy filing that the administration is confident it will be fully vindicated. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Trump's health secretary, did not join.

Key figures

Three sides of the story

14Liberal8Center8Conservative

30 news outlets reported this

Tap a color or swipe sideways to switch sides.

Liberal14 outlets

Kennedy family's personal stake in the arch fight

CBS News opens with the family joining the legal battle and notes that the had no comment. It adds that the government says the plaintiffs lack standing and quotes White House spokesman Davis Ingle, who expects the administration to be "fully vindicated." The Guardian leads with the gilded arch that the family says would "cast a shadow" over JFK's grave, and reports Trump's claim that it would hold a "top-grade military complex."

ABC News, in a wire report, notes that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did not join and that Democrats gained control of Congress in the , which could bring scrutiny of Trump's Washington projects. The Boston Globe quotes the complaint at length and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's filing describing the arch as a "generational national defense opportunity." It notes that the planning commission is "stacked with Trump allies."

Center8 outlets

Kennedys' legal claims and sightline concerns

UPI and Courthouse News both lead with the family joining the suit. UPI lists the earlier suits by veterans, preservationists, Virginia and Washington, D.C., and says a National Park Service review found the arch would hurt dozens of historic sites. Courthouse News details the six-page motion and the 8-4 commission vote, quoting commission chairman Mark Paoletta, who calls the arch a "generational security opportunity."

Newsweek centers on the filing's phrase "permanent denigration" and JFK's remark about the view, "I could stay here forever." It says the Kennedys want the court to declare the construction unlawful and to issue . The Seattle Times, running a report also carried by The Boston Globe, says the family's suit expands on earlier arguments by describing the personal effect on relatives.

It reports Chutkan's 33-page opinion finding the arch needed congressional approval.

Conservative8 outlets

Fourth lawsuit against Trump's arch, awaiting court ruling

The Washington Examiner reports the suit as the fourth legal challenge to Trump's "highly controversial monument." It cites the 27-page complaint and the 8-4 commission vote, and notes that an Obama-appointed judge halted construction plans for two weeks. It describes Democracy Defenders Fund as a "progressive legal watchdog," lists the defendants, including Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, and says whether Congress must authorize the arch will be decided in court.

It adds that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was not mentioned in the suit and has not spoken publicly about the arch. The Washington Times reports that the relatives sought on Tuesday to join the case, arguing the arch would ruin JFK's burial site.

Where outlets disagree
All sources: 38 articles from 30 outlets

Liberal (20)

Center (9)

Conservative (9)

Related
  1. Judge halts tree cutting at DC golf course as Trump vows to appeal
  2. Judge dismisses Trump's $10 billion suit over WSJ story on Epstein birthday letter
  3. Federal panel is expected to approve Trump's 250-foot arch despite court challenges
  4. Judge blocks construction of Trump's 250-foot arch for 14 days
  5. Nine Kennedy relatives ask to join lawsuits against Trump's arch near Arlington cemeteryThis story
Congress

The US parliament: the Senate and the House of Representatives. A bill becomes law when both pass it and the president signs it.

All terms →
Interior Department

The federal ministry that manages public lands, national parks, water and natural resources. It has nothing to do with the police.

All terms →
Justice Department

The federal ministry that prosecutes federal crimes. The FBI is part of it, and its head is the Attorney General.

All terms →
Midterm elections

US elections halfway through a president's four-year term. The whole House, a third of the Senate and many governors are elected. In 2026 Election Day was November 3.

All terms →
Injunction

A court order that stops a government or a company from doing something, or makes it act, often while the case is being decided. A temporary restraining order is the quick, short version.

All terms →